I agree with much of Professor Sparshott’s argument. I would add that when film is not taken as a recording of events that occurred, it is taken as a recording of events that were contrived; and that it is taken as a recording entails that no film is taken as present time. When we are caught up in viewing a film, we are primarily concerned with the story. Our fundamental concern is not with the film’s space and time, but with certain characters in human situations. Our main concern is with human experience.
"On Sparshott’s ‘Vision and Dream in the Cinema’,"
Philosophic Exchange: Vol. 2
, Article 15.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/phil_ex/vol2/iss1/15