Professor Weitz contends that there are no necessary conditions of human action. This paper will focus on his objections to the theories of Roderick Chisholm, Donald Davidson, and others. The disagreement turns on the correct interpretation of certain cases. For example, is falling in love an action? What about missing a target?
Alston, William P.
"Response to Weitz,"
Philosophic Exchange: Vol. 3
, Article 22.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/phil_ex/vol3/iss1/22
Continental Philosophy Commons, Epistemology Commons, Esthetics Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Commons, Metaphysics Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Philosophy of Science Commons